![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Is it possible for you to make a conventional soft shackle and break it to see if your results are calibrated to others? It should break at 125% of line strength plus or minus. If it is breaking at 200% of line strength, then we know what is going on. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Yes, next time I am doing some testing, I will make up a soft shackle with only one knot and see what I get. I will also pull the one I already made and see if I can make it break. I could also make another one with multiple knots and see if that is the same too.
But you will also have ot take a look at mey new idea and tell me what you think ;-) Anton |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi again,
Let's just back up a bit. We have a lovely new configuration, which I will tentatively call an Inverse Otto, that wants testing. So far, our intrepid inventor has, with a minimum of equipment and a lot of enthusiasm, demonstrated that it shows promise. There are variables to be dealt with: multiple vs. single lanyard knots; tapers in the splices; actual strength of the materials; how much load comes where; and maybe especially how accurate the machinery is. So I urge you to send some samples in, configured any way you like, for our Extravaganza. You get free breaks, courtesy of Treestuff, plus enduring fame. Fair leads, Brion Toss Last edited by Brion Toss : 03-20-2015 at 12:53 PM. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oh, I like that. When is the deadline, and where do I send them?
Ping me off list if you want. Anton PS I would like to call it the Flexible Anton Soft Shroud Inadvisable Attachment. Last edited by Anton B : 03-19-2015 at 06:31 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|