SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-2009, 10:51 AM
Bob Pingel Bob Pingel is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 133
Default A couple reasons..

I think the reason that most mast tangs are configured a "forks" is because fork terminals on wire are not real practical. You could use an aircraft fork, but they are suboptimal in marine applications. You could use a marine eye toggle but they are expensive (twice the cost of an eye) and toggle action is typically not necessary.

Yes, the tangs are a bit of a bother to fabricate, but it seems to give the best and most economical solution.

Bob Pingel
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-04-2009, 07:38 PM
S/V Liberty S/V Liberty is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 3
Default

Ah OK. Hayn seems to make some nice swaged "marine" forks that don't have the smaller clevis pin hole that the aircraft forks do, but, yes, they are way more expensive than an eye of similar strength. But you're right. It makes more sense to put extra effort into the mast hardware (rarely changed) rather than extra expense in wire terminals (changed more often). Thank you for setting me straight!

Seth
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-05-2009, 08:44 AM
Ian McColgin Ian McColgin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hyannis, MA
Posts: 368
Default

I must be missing something.

If you have a fork it must go to an eye. I can't imagine a reason, except ease of building, why it matters which is which. Chainplates are usually a single tang and very robust, filling the space in the stay's fork. Mast tangs can be either but it's often easier to work with two pieces of thinner stainless to make a fork than to work with one to make a tang - depending on where. An over-the-truck tang that holds both headstay and backstay might be more readily made of one piece with forks on the stays. Shroud tangs, especially lowers, might be forks but might be eyes if made up Herreshoff style for screwing to a wooden mast.

Assuming they are matched - and manufactorers seem to be wonderfully consistant in pin and hole sizes and matching for a give wire size - you will have a fair load. Forks and eyes are ubiquitous in the marine industry.

I could see some unfair loading if the fork is really made of two tangs coming out from some bolts into the mast. Unlike a forged fork that you'd find in a stay terminal it is easiy to imagine that one could have a little misalignment. As it happens, most people drill the hold-down holes in the outer tang first, then put the pin in both and clam them to the bench while drilling through to the inner tang. Or pin, clamp and drill them bother. Either way, it's hard to go wrong and it's hard to fit the correctly sized pin through misaligned holes.

G'luck
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.