![]() |
EDUCATION | CATALOG | RIGGING | CONSULTATION | HOME | CONTACT US |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pinning the gooseneck will result in *poorer* sail shape, and will more quickly distort a non-laminate sail material (probably also a laminate, but I don't have experience with those to say with certainty.
Quote:
The sliding gooseneck can allow a lower c of e; that was in fact part of the point of *not* switching to the fixed gooseneck. Jacklines or not is a personal preference, not related to the gooseneck type. And I believe you have very easy access to a sailmaker to confirm my statement regarding sail shape. Amgine Last edited by Amgine : 06-28-2007 at 08:28 AM. |
#2
|
|||||
|
|||||
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Fair leads, Brion Toss |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Exactly. The only difference is the use of the Cunningham, which is an ingenious development to modify the shape of the sail on the fly but it creates a point load within the sail.
The sliding gooseneck has the same effect, but it spreads the load into the tabling rather than from a single point. All other points being equal, the gooseneck will result in slightly better shape and considerably less distorting loads within the sail. As for jacklines, can you explain why they would be required for a sliding gooseneck with a stop? For that matter, I removed them from my gaffer as well after adding a pair of small teak buttons in lieu of a table. There is no need for the boom to fall to the deck without halyard tension. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|