SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old 07-05-2006, 03:48 AM
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Default Slot

Thanks for your comments. The rig design, with its significantly swept spreaders, is already a compromise in order to achieve a stiffer mast. With the mast set so far forward, the slot is miniscule and tacking any sail through it would be highly undesirable from a number of perspectives. The inner stay is there to fly heavy weather sails and to oppose its pull with the runners. The rig is ì runner independent ì according to the manufacture.

A Baby stay would be more acceptable but at days end, I believe this is mainly about the mast sections lack of stiffness and perhaps harmonics due to poorly chosen wire fixing locations.

I agree that the lack of forward lowers is contributing to the instability. I would wonder why any designer would not use split lowers except to save cost or for interior space issues associated with a second chain plate.

If the observed motion was only in higher sea conditions my concerns would be elevated. Seeing the mast pumping away in a one foot chop tells me there is something seriously wrong with this rig.
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.