SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-11-2014, 02:20 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Aha!

Hi again,
On the one hand, you have a huge lateral angle; you could take the forward shroud tang up to about 30ft. and still have 12 degrees. On the other hand, the forward sweep would be negligible by then. So you could only get your forward intermediate (or a more effective forward staying at the current height) by moving the chainplates forward. Say, to about 4ft. or more forward of the mast, assuming that the shroud would not then be in the way of the main boom.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-11-2014, 04:47 PM
mariner2k mariner2k is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: RI USA
Posts: 43
Default Plan B?

Ok, bearing in mind that the point of this exercise is to be able to fly a mizzen staysail. The double backs on the main can be dealt with when I change masts.
Assuming I can't move the lowers forward 4' (though I will check), I'd like to back up a bit.
My old ketch had a springstay opposed by running backstays on the mizzen cap. I know how you feel about springstays but could this be a do-able option?
Or settle with flying a small staysail from just below the jumpers, which would puts me around 20' from the highest deck.
Why would a builder design a ketch without the ability to use a staysail? I assume that there is a reason for that configuration.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.