SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-13-2011, 09:36 AM
rickc rickc is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta (landlocked!)
Posts: 2
Default Strait Bend Testing?

I am interested in any testing results anyone knows of for the Strait Bend (pg 72 of the Apprentice). My specific use for this knot would be to join two 8mm to 11 mm nylon climbing ropes. The joined ropes would be used for rappelling. Typical forces are less than 1000 lbs force but with considerable possible jerking as the line is loaded and unloaded. I am unhappy wih the knot currently beiing recommended by many in the climbing community and am looking for a knot with a good lead, is relatively easy to untie after loading, is reasonably strong, and is secure under load cycling.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Rick C
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-14-2011, 01:23 AM
allene allene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickc View Post
I am interested in any testing results anyone knows of for the Strait Bend (pg 72 of the Apprentice). My specific use for this knot would be to join two 8mm to 11 mm nylon climbing ropes. The joined ropes would be used for rappelling. Typical forces are less than 1000 lbs force but with considerable possible jerking as the line is loaded and unloaded. I am unhappy wih the knot currently beiing recommended by many in the climbing community and am looking for a knot with a good lead, is relatively easy to untie after loading, is reasonably strong, and is secure under load cycling.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Rick C
I just found some references on the topic and put them on my site. The strait bend is the same as an alpine butterfly pulled straight. (It is the alpine butterfly with the loop cut). Link This article is probably of interest as it deals with climbing knots in general. It says that the knot retains 61 to 72% of its strength on page 15.

I found other articles and they are indexed here http://L-36.com/rope_articles.php

Allen
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-14-2011, 07:54 AM
benz benz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newport RI
Posts: 244
Default do it

Hi,

Before I retired from climbing, the strait bend was what I used exclusively for rappelling. The overhand everyone else was using tends to roll, and people would end up leaving ridiculously long tails, or tying another overhand in the tails, to feel safe. I thought it better safety to have a decent bend properly tied.
I put it in one or Rock and Ice's tech tips in '05 or '06, I forget presicely when.
The Zeppelin bend is also very good, and will cause your climbing buddies some eye-popping concern.
Tie carefully,
Ben

Last edited by benz : 12-14-2011 at 07:55 AM. Reason: misspelled "rappelling"
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-14-2011, 11:31 AM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Diameters

Hi,
Grand question. As noted above, the Strait Bend is stronger than some bends (it retains about 60% of the strength of conventional synthetics), and is more secure than some other knots that climbers use. It also, as you noted, has a superior lead, so the ends are less liable to snag on things. It shares these traits with some other bends, notably the Ashley Bend and the Zeppelin Bend. Given an adequate safety factor, security and lead are the most important qualities, so this family features my favorite bends.
Unfortunately, non of the formal tests I've conducted have been with dissimilar rope diameters or materials. Informally, my experience is that these bends seem to be every bit as secure as a Double Sheet Bend, but I wouldn't want to rappel on different diameters without further testing.
By the way, it's not exactly true that the Strait Bend is an Alpine Bend with the loop cut. I think it's more accurate to say that the two knots are structurally analogous, in the same way that the Bowline and Sheet Bend are. The knots are tied in different ways, for different purposes, and usually loaded quite differently.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-14-2011, 11:15 PM
allene allene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 191
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brion Toss View Post
By the way, it's not exactly true that the Strait Bend is an Alpine Bend with the loop cut. I think it's more accurate to say that the two knots are structurally analogous, in the same way that the Bowline and Sheet Bend are. The knots are tied in different ways, for different purposes, and usually loaded quite differently.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
There are obviously two ways to load an Alpine Bend. Pulling on the two rope ends and pulling on one rope end and the loop. When I linked the article, I thought that the test was done by pulling on the two ends of the rope but I see now that it was the other way around. My mistake.

Here is another article that tests what they call "Alpine Butterfly Knot (to tie ropes together)". Link The interesting thing in this test is that mostly the knot didn't break. The line broke at the attachment to the test fixture. This is a pretty good example of the frustration of trying to find good data on the strength of knots. But as they said, the knot is very strong.

You might also be interested in knot #28 in this 1975 publication. Link

Allen

Last edited by allene : 12-14-2011 at 11:31 PM. Reason: corrected error.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-16-2011, 08:51 PM
teknocholer teknocholer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9
Default

First of all, while I have done some rappelling, it has always been with a doubled rope or a single top-anchored rope, not with joined ropes, so my comments are not based on experience.

The article that Allene links to places a lot of emphasis on ease of retrieval. and less on the absolute strength of the knots being investigated. This makes sense, since most ropes used by climbers and cavers have very large factors of safety, and a snagged rope could be a serious problem. However, the knot Drohan finally recommends doesn't have much going for it but decent lead. (I note that the Wikipedia article on the Overhand Bend says that American climbers have referred to this as the European Death Knot.)

Since lead is considered so important, I wonder if the Tucked Sheet Bend, aka Binder Twine Knot, is worth investigating. That's the knot this link http://www.hudson-family.net/knots/knots.html calls the Locking Sheet Bend.

Pros:

- near-perfect lead in one direction, and presents a fairly slim face to any possible snags.

- stronger than the Overhand Bend

- probably more secure than the regular Sheet Bend under jerking loads, but it should be backed up by tying overhands with the ends around the standing part.

- easier to untie than an Overhand Bend or a Double Fisherman

Cons:

- more complicated to tie than the Overhand

- must be tied facing the right way

Anyone want to do some testing? In the lab or on the rock face, your call.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-19-2011, 05:41 AM
benz benz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Newport RI
Posts: 244
Default

I like that locking sheet bend, with the exception that it only has a good lead in one direction. When doing multiple rappels all in a row, the rope you must pull on alternates, so the lead would be alternately fair and foul. Another factor in trying to sell new knots to climbers, is that lots of them are really dumb, and a euro death knot is the only one they can understand. Any bend that requires thought and care in tying is liable to be mis-tied, especially in rain or snow or darkness, with possibly fatal consequenses. So change comes slowly, because climbing instructors want to teach the easiest possible bend and so lose the least amount of students later on.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2011, 12:34 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default

[quote=benz;6082 ... climbing instructors want to teach the easiest possible bend and so lose the least amount of students later on.[/QUOTE]
This one, sadly, resonates as true. It's a patronizing, even contemptuous motivation, like teaching people pidgin English, because they aren't intelligent enough to handle real English. Those climbers, by and large, are not stupid; they just aren't familiar with knots. And even really simple knots can be -- and are, sometimes -- tied incorrectly. So climbing instructors are perpetuating inferior knots for everyone, for no good reason.
Rising nobly above this situation, I would stick to the question, of what is a good bend, and this can be answered with hard data. I'm a bit overextended on tests at the moment, but if anyone out there wants to pester someone into doing tests, you are looking for both strength and security. For the latter, note that many knots can be "dressed" in more than one way, most often in how the ends lay inside the knot. With the Strait Bend, for instance, they lie alongside each other, and either one might be "on top."
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-28-2011, 07:58 PM
teknocholer teknocholer is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 9
Default

Here are some sites with tests of the Overhand Bend (EDK) and some alternatives:

Tom Moyer http://user.xmission.com/~tmoyer/testing/EDK.html prefers a Figure 8 follow-through with safeties.

This site http://www.needlesports.com/catalogu...9-9c9e00a60c7f has some tests on the EDK (which they call simply Overhand) and the EDK with a backup Overhand Bend (which they call a Double Overhand).

This site http://www.gudelius.de/spst.htm has a couple of interesting alternatives, tested by Edelrid. The one he calls the Triple T-Fisherman's Knot looks especially easy to tie.

All agree that the Flat Figure 8 is dangerous and should never be used.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:57 PM
Dan Lehman Dan Lehman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 51
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rickc View Post
I am interested in any testing results anyone knows of for the Strait Bend (pg 72 of the Apprentice). My specific use for this knot would be to join two 8mm to 11 mm nylon climbing ropes. The joined ropes would be used for rappelling. Typical forces are less than 1000 lbs force but with considerable possible jerking as the line is loaded and unloaded.
Why ask for (often dubious) test results, when you have all the means to do your
own testing --YOUR particular paired ropes, you body mass, and the ability to tie
up a 2-to-1 crude pulley system (using a 'biner) to increase applied force. Indeed,
your own non-pullied mass is approximately itself double the forces to be expected.
And yet it's common for folks to ask for some break test, which is hardly relevant
to the act of abseiling!

cf the discussion of a better analysis of the common abseil-ropes joint, and some
alternatives that are also *offset*, here : http://www.rockclimbing.com/cgi-bin/...set%20fig .9;

Quote:
I am unhappy with the knot currently being recommended by many in the climbing community and am looking for a knot with a good lead, is relatively easy to untie after loading, is reasonably strong, and is secure under load cycling.
Thanks for your help in advance.
Rick C
Let me guess --you don't say-- that the "knot currently being recommended by many"
is the infamous "EDK", better named "offset water knot" (i.e., a water knot, aka ring bend,
aka --to some-- and (double) overhand knot, loaded in the *offset* manner --both ends on one side).
And it fits the task arguably better than any other : easily/quickly tied (rappelling comes
sometimes at late hours with fatigue, or pressure from approaching weather), compact
and **offset** --making for easy flow over rough surfaces, less prone to snag--, and, to
your particular question, it's an asymmetric knot enabling it to work better with
unequal rope diameters, properly orienting those ropes in the knot.

Quote:
The [offset water knot] everyone else was using tends to roll, and people would end up leaving ridiculously long tails, or tying another overhand in the tails, to feel safe. I thought it better safety to have a decent bend properly tied.
"Tends to roll"?? To my awareness, there are no reports of failure of this knot, beyond
one of dubious accuracy of some fellow followed by two women. One might consider
the popular and regular usage of the knot for decades to constitute sufficient testing.
Then, again, one can yet wonder if there is some vulnerability awaiting tickling!? But
if you can tie these other suggested knots --none of which is offset, so lacks that benefit--,
you can surely learn to tie the offset water knot to advantage!

Quote:
The Zeppelin bend is also very good, and will cause your climbing buddies some eye-popping concern.
Firstly, are you entirely comfortable with the comparatively *airy* (i.e., gaps in the knot)
zeppelin being immune to snagging and being pulled open? --no, not in use, but in the
pull-down of rope, which though unlikely (immediately) fatal, would surely be a major
disappointment (leaving one rope untied well up the wall).
As for impressing your partners, while that can have its element of fun, it has obvious
drawbacks, practically (mutiny comes to mind). There is comfort in the familiar.

Quote:
... these bends seem to be every bit as secure as a Double Sheet Bend, ...
!!
Considering Dave Richards's testing which found this as well as the single sheet bend
AND single fisherman's knot to slip (at relatively high loads --way above what even obese
climbers would generate), I'd not cite it as a model of security; it is i.p. hardly so secure
when slack, esp. in the kermantle ropes at issue here.

Quote:
it's not exactly true that the Strait Bend is an Alpine B[utterfly] with the loop cut. I think it's more accurate to say that the two knots are structurally analogous, in the same way that the Bowline and Sheet Bend are.
??! That's exactly the relationship between butterfly bend & eyeknot ; whereas, with
the other two, the match is inexact in that the sheet bend is typically recommended
with tails (resp. standing parts) on the same side --not what results from eye cutting.

Quote:
The interesting thing in this test is that mostly the [butterflyknot didn't break. The line broke at the attachment to the test fixture. This is a pretty good example of the frustration of trying to find good data on the strength of knots. But as they said, the knot is very strong.
Again --to emphasize--, for rappelling, one is NOT NOT NOT concerned with strength
(unless you're using dental floss?)! You cannot make a knot weak enough in normal
abseil ropes to be at all a risk in strength. (But this dubiously got datum nevertheless
captures the imaginations ... .)

The breakage at the bollards cited in the Bushwhackers report sure surprises, but it
can be conjectured to have this basis : the knot was tested as the joint forming a round
sling in one rope; the sling was relatively short (because of test-device stroke), and
the compression of the knot in loading made a significant imbalance between forces
on the two sides --knotted & straight-- of the sling such that the knot was protected
from actual high-as-there-were forces. --something I'd have expected with the
grapevine (dbl.fish.) bend, but that report found the former feeds out more material.

Quote:
I wonder if the Tucked Sheet Bend, aka Binder Twine Knot, is worth investigating. That's the knot this link http://www.hudson-family.net/knots/knots.html calls the Locking Sheet Bend.
Pros:
- near-perfect lead in one direction, and presents a fairly slim face to any possible snags.
- stronger than the Overhand Bend
...
No, the "lead" isn't so good; you can verify the benefits of an **offset** end-2-end knot
but pulling it around a sharp corner (of a desk, e.g.); non-offset knots can hang up.
And "stronger ..." is in a practical sense false : no knot will be breaking, so = strength.

I question its low-load & when-slack security --thinking that the bight (U-part) is liable
to pull out.

Quote:
When doing multiple rappels all in a row, the rope you must pull on alternates, so the lead would be alternately fair and foul.
Why ... ? It has been argued to pull the haul line if that is the smaller line conjoined
with the climbing rope (to make the retrievable, twin-strand abseil line), as the end-2-end
joint would be placed to snug against the rap-ring upon *slippage* got by virtue of differing
rates of flow through the abseil device --and one can't pull the knot through the ring.
You retrieve the two tied together : why would you set them up any differently than the
prior time, and want to pull in the opposite manner (?) (There could also be a question
about which rope you would rather have stuck, if that happened, and which in hand.)

--dl*
====
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.