SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 04-05-2010, 03:56 PM
memelet memelet is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 24
Default Running backs -- continuous line or two part?

I was planning in using something t900 (partially stripped) or amsteel (partially covered) as a single line to my winches . I also want to setup the shock cord retractors described in a earlier post.

But today one of the riggers at the yard where I'm doing my work admonished me against using a single line. He said I should amsteel with thimble connected to the tail. His reasoning was that if the uncovered line gets damaged on that part would need to be replaced.

Sounds reasonable and I would no problems doing that, but I'm concerned that the thimble will interfere with the retractor block at the end of the shock cord.

First is it so important to use two parts?

And second, if I did use two parts, I'm assuming that the retrator block would need to below the amsteel on the second covered part. But in my mind (I'll probably draw this out and do the geometry) the block will want to roll over the thimble with this setup.

Can someone set me straight? Thanks!
Reply With Quote
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.