SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2015, 09:43 AM
DougM DougM is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 1
Default Mast step rebuild corrosion insulation

I am looking for a material for insulating the base of the mast from the mast step. The step is stainless steel, stepped on the keel. I will have to cut about 3/8" off the foot of the mast to eliminate most of the corrosion.

I have read some similar posts but I have not got the answers I want yet.

The mast step is the male type with 4 ears that extend into the mast. There was a large weep hole but being in the bilge moisture must still be a problem.

I cut about 1/2 " off the mast 10 years ago when rerigging for the same reason. I just added 1/2" ss plate under the step to take up the space.

This time I would like to do a better job that I hope will get rid of 90% of the corrosion. I want to us a plastic material to both build up the step and insulate it.

I want to fit it on top of the SS mast step and make cutouts for the vertical ears to fit through. I could also use an aluminum plate, but then I have to insulate that from the SS mast step too.

To choose the material I want to know the approximate load on the base of the mast.

The boat is a Seguin 44 with 10mm head and backstage, fore and aft lowers 5/16 and 1/2" shrouds at the deck that divide into D2 and V2D3 at the lower spreaders.

My guesstimate for the working load is 18000 pounds. Does this sound reasonable?

With a mast section of 0.185" the area of the mast is 4.6 sq in. Guessing about 80% of the mast in contact with the step gives about 4000 psi at the base of the mast.

OK ?

The next step is the material. I want something fairly easy to work and available at a reasonable price. Maybe a scrap of white Corian which should support 16000 psi. And is stable in the wet environment.

Any comments or suggestions ?

Thanks
Doug M
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-16-2015, 12:32 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Numbers take time

Hi,
And first, the calculations would require more time than I can spend here, but G10 is going to be good for the job. But if I understand your plan, you would be shortening the effective length of the step's ears. Seems like a bad idea, as lateral loads would then be much more concentrated. I think I'd be inclined instead to smear everything with Tef-Gel or Eck, and just put the G-10 under the current step.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.