SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-10-2010, 08:40 AM
Andy Schell Andy Schell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: s/v Arcturus, currently docked in Pompano Beach, FL.
Posts: 6
Send a message via Skype™ to Andy Schell
Default Mizzen Loads on Yawl

I have a similar question to Brian Duff's about mizzen mast loads. I'm attempting to re-design the mizzen mast on my 35' yawl to eliminate the need for a triatic stay. I intend to add intermediate shrouds 16' up on a 21' mast, and bring them forward, to replace the triatic. Is there a magic angle I need to provide that staying? It's currently approximately 25" forward of the mast base, and I read somewhere that one inch fore/aft is minimum for 1 foot of rise on the mast.

Also, the rig used to have aft-swept spreaders. I'm wondering if I can do away with them...this decreases the shroud angle to 9 degrees, but the mizzen sail is only 50 sq. ft., so the forces are very low - I'm using 7mm dux rigging. Obviously there will be more mast compression without spreaders, but can I compensate by pre-tensioning the uppers more than I would with spreaders?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-10-2010, 09:25 AM
Ian McColgin Ian McColgin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hyannis, MA
Posts: 368
Default

Ahoy Andy,

Why? Properly a triadic is a very light stay as not much pressure is needed at that angle to keep the mizzen from falling back when on a beat - considerably less than the weight of a pair of stays leading steaply down.

Whether you'd save anything with the elimination of swept spreaders is also a question. I never liked carrying the mizzen off the wind anyway - more fond of the staysail.

But, different boats, different long splices.

G'luck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-11-2010, 09:59 AM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Options

Hello,
Have you looked at the section on mizzens in the "Apprentice"? It covers the cans of variables that you are opening. I like getting rid of springstays (not triatics; those are for square-riggers, steamships, and schooners)when possible, but not when the sum of the new vectors makes things worse. As for the optimal angle, an inch per foot gives you less than 5 degrees. Better to have between 5 and 7. The more you get, the less compression and the less tension needed to keep the stick forward. The limiting factor will likely be the main boom.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2010, 04:27 PM
Andy Schell Andy Schell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: s/v Arcturus, currently docked in Pompano Beach, FL.
Posts: 6
Send a message via Skype™ to Andy Schell
Default Thanks

Thanks for the input (sorry for the faux pas Brion). I've done the re-rig with Dynex Dux, so weight with the added intermediates is not an issue. I managed to get them far enough forward to give me about 7 degrees, and the boom clears them, though I need to re-route the mainsheet, which I was going to do anyway. The mizzen now has uppers led slightly aft, lowers led further aft, and the intermediates led forward, and I hope should work just fine. The sail is only 75 sq feet, so the loads are fairly small. It also has running backs for when I set a staysail on it. The Dux is excellent, easy to splice and very light. Plus, the deadeyes on the old yawl look very cool. Thanks for the input.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.