SparTalk
EDUCATION CATALOG RIGGING CONSULTATION HOME CONTACT US

Go Back   SparTalk > SparTalk
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-24-2008, 05:07 PM
mholmes mholmes is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Default add tang for running backstay to existing throughbolt?

I have a valiant 40 1978. We just redid the rig with 1x19 316 stainless, including the intermediate backstays because we had already ordered the wire and fittings (about which we have had numerous valuable conversations in this forum).

We're going to add 5/16" amsteel blue running backs. I want to know whether I can add a second tang on top of the intermediate's tang using the same throughbolt, and keep BOTH the old intermediates and have running backs too. That way we'll have intermediates for when we're lazy and running backs for serious weather. I don't see why the extra tang on the same bolt would be a problem, but I also don't yet trust my intuition on these matters.

I know what you're going to say: that it's way overdoing it to keep both, and that it negates the benefit of having running backs (to let the boom extend closer to the shrouds). But I also read a quote in the Apprentice that went: "nothing too strong ever broke".

but sharing the one throughbolt for both tangs: ok or not?

much appreciation for all the superb advice,
matt
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-24-2008, 05:31 PM
Brion Toss Brion Toss is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,180
Default Strength

Hello,
That is correct: nothing too strong ever broke. That is exactly why you don't want to put both stays on one bolt.Consider that the loads will be highest when you are driving to weather. If you are not lazy, you will take up on the runners, but those intermediates will still be loaded, just from tune. You now have more load on the bolt than before. Likewise consider that the runners, if they are outboard, will be pulling on a longer lever arm than before, by the thickness of the intermediate tang. Yet more load. Finally, if you will, consider why you are even raising this question. I don't know why you are asking, but it doesn't sound like it's based so much as in engineering as in something else entirely.
If you must keep both stays, put the runner on its own bolt. The bolt itself is the only cost difference, and you get a distributed redundancy out of the deal.
Finally, consider sailing with those intermediates dead slack, and see if they make even the least bit of difference 3/4 of the time.
Fair leads,
Brion Toss
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-24-2008, 07:15 PM
mholmes mholmes is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 11
Default

brion,
thanks for answering what in retrospect seems to be a dumb question. What you say makes perfect sense.
regards,
matt
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.