![]() |
Quote:
Is it possible for you to make a conventional soft shackle and break it to see if your results are calibrated to others? It should break at 125% of line strength plus or minus. If it is breaking at 200% of line strength, then we know what is going on. |
Yes, next time I am doing some testing, I will make up a soft shackle with only one knot and see what I get. I will also pull the one I already made and see if I can make it break. I could also make another one with multiple knots and see if that is the same too.
But you will also have ot take a look at mey new idea and tell me what you think ;-) Anton |
Standards
Hi again,
Let's just back up a bit. We have a lovely new configuration, which I will tentatively call an Inverse Otto, that wants testing. So far, our intrepid inventor has, with a minimum of equipment and a lot of enthusiasm, demonstrated that it shows promise. There are variables to be dealt with: multiple vs. single lanyard knots; tapers in the splices; actual strength of the materials; how much load comes where; and maybe especially how accurate the machinery is. So I urge you to send some samples in, configured any way you like, for our Extravaganza. You get free breaks, courtesy of Treestuff, plus enduring fame. Fair leads, Brion Toss |
Oh, I like that. When is the deadline, and where do I send them?
Ping me off list if you want. Anton PS I would like to call it the Flexible Anton Soft Shroud Inadvisable Attachment. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.